The House on Hunter Street, David Ebsworth (SilverWood Books, 2022)

I was particularly delighted to receive my copy of The House on Hunter Street from David Ebsworth because I’d seen an early draft of the novel and we’d discussed aspects of the women’s suffrage movement. While I don’t believe there’s a “right” or “wrong” way to tell the history, it is more complex than many people realise and there’s often a tendency to cling to simplistic interpretations. For example, the idea that the suffragettes won the vote for women is a very popular way of presenting the campaign, but it’s very far from telling the full story or being the only narrative that deserves to be heard.

The House on Hunter Street brings alive one of those perhaps lesser-known narratives of the suffrage movement by focussing on the perspective of a working-class woman, Cari Maddox, and linking the women’s campaign with the struggles of the labour movement. Cari’s story is told against a backdrop of the 1911 dockers’ strikes in Liverpool, which in its turn brings in racial inequalities through the involvement of African seamen. At the same time, women’s rights, labour rights and black people’s rights don’t always go hand in hand, and the book captures those complexities. Thrown into the mix are religious tensions between protestants and Catholics, and there’s also a keen interest in the immigrant experience: the Welsh Maddoxs live alongside Irish, African and German immigrants.

This is a Liverpool of troubles and tensions, which often erupt into violence. It’s how this setting affects the characters that makes for an absorbing story. Cari and her family face their trials and tribulations, have their love affairs, their secrets, and fall out with one another, lending elements of family saga to the tale. I really liked Cari; she’s a strong woman amongst a cast of strong and vivid characters, and her faith in family is touching. Her belief – and desire – that families stick together (they “close ranks around each other – no matter what may come of it”) is an important aspect of her character. It is one that is tested by her brother who offends his father by falling in love with a “Papist”, and a sister hiding from the police after a theft at her workplace.

The non-militant suffrage campaigners' premises in Liverpool

Cari really comes into her own when her family is threatened by one of the most deranged, scene-chewing villains I’ve come across in a long time. Tom Priddy is sinister, vengeful, sly and insinuating, and his wicked machinations are a joy to behold. He’s a baddie deserving of the worst kind of come-uppance. Does he get it? No spoilers here!

All in all, The House on Hunter Street is a powerful, forthright novel. Dave’s personal links to the story are explained in the useful Historical Notes at the end of the book, which increase the sense of a story written with passion and commitment. My only quibble is that though the structure – the focus on a single year, 1911 – works very well, it meant I didn’t get the rest of Cari’s story!

An enjoyable and absorbing read.

Picture Credits:

Liverpool branch of the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies - Women's Library on Flickr, No Known Copyright Restrictions

Dickens and Chickens

On 17 April 1860, in fields near Farnborough, Charles Dickens joined an audience amongst whom were the Prince of Wales and the Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston, as well as a number of MPs and clergymen, to watch the American John Carmel Heenan and England’s Tom Sayers (the Brighton Titch) beat one another blind and bloody in a bare-knuckle fight that lasted nearly two and a half hours. The fight ended in a draw when Aldershot police stormed the ring, forcing the fighters and their illustrious spectators to flee the scene. It was the brutality of this match that signalled an end to the bare-knuckle era and prompted the development of the Marquess of Queensberry’s rules. Dickens’s interest in pugilism was of long standing. In 1848 Dombey and Son , which had been published in serial form over the preceding two years, came out in book form. One of many of his novels that draws on the world of the prize fighter, it introduces the unforgettable Mr Toots, a would-be man about town, an...

The Bristol Boys: The Bare Knuckle Champions and The Hatchet Inn

The Hatchet Inn on Frogmore Street in Bristol is all that remains of a row of seventeenth-century timbered houses dating back to 1606 – making it one of the city’s oldest pubs. It was substantially altered in the 1960s, and these days it stands on a traffic island. But at one time it boasted extensive grounds – and amongst the facilities on offer was a bare-knuckle boxing ring. Plaque at The Hatchet Inn, Bristol The pub’s connection with Bristol’s boxing heroes is commemorated in a plaque illustrating five of Bristol’s champions – one of whom, Hen Pearce, features in Bloodie Bones: A Dan Foster Mystery. Hen Pearce (Detail) Bristol born Hen Pearce, The Game Chicken (1777 – 1809), a former butcher’s boy, became champion of England in 1805. He was a hero inside and outside the ring. In 1807 he climbed onto the roof of a building in Thomas Street, Bristol to rescue a servant girl from a fire. Always a popular figure, this courageous act inspired many eulogies in pr...

'We will have a fire': arson during eighteenth-century enclosures

Join our Winter Solstice Blog Hop! Thirty writers throw light on a dazzling range of topics . Follow the links at the end of this article to be enlightened and brightened by our blogs... “Inclosure came and trampled on the grave Of labours rights and left the poor a slave And memorys pride ere want to wealth did bow Is both the shadow and the substance now.” John Clare, The Mores On 1 May 1794, the writer Hester (Thrale) Piozzi of Streatham Park recorded in her diary that the furze on the common had been set on fire in protest at the enclosure of land “which really & of just Right belonged to the poor of the Parish”. Yet even while she acknowledged that the protesters had justice on their side, she criticised them for not “going to Law like wise fellows” and concluded: “So senseless are Le Peuple , & so unfitted to be souverain”. The senseless poor of Streatham were not unique. During the eighteenth centu...

Search This Blog