Skip to main content

Tea and Suffrage

In 2006 the BBC Antiques Road Show was filmed at the University of Sydney. One of the items their experts valued was a suffragette tea set manufactured in Staffordshire by Williamsons of Longton. It comprised six art deco cups, saucers and plates, a cake plate, tea pot, milk jug and sugar bowl decorated in the colours of the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU). The set was decorated with the iconic design of the angel of freedom blowing a trumpet and carrying a banner with the word “Freedom” on it. 

 

 

The tea service was designed by Sylvia Pankhurst for the WSPU’s 1909 exhibition at the Prince’s Skating Rink in London. A Scottish version for use at a WSPU exhibition in Glasgow was produced in 1910. The angel design was also used on the cover of bound copies of the WSPU newspaper, Votes for Women.

As soon as I saw the Sydney tea set I wanted one! Alas, these are very rare items and consequently very expensive. Complete sets are rarer still, and it’s more usual to see pieces sold separately or in small groups, such as a collection of four pieces which the Shropshire Star reported was due to be sold in May 2019.

The WSPU Drum and Fife Band advertising the 1909 WSPU Exhibition


The Shropshire Star described the event at Prince’s Skating Rink as a “now-forgotten exhibition”. This must have come as something of a surprise to the many historians, researchers and biographers who have written books, articles and blogs about the suffrage movement. I suppose it’s easier to conclude that if you don’t know something yourself, no one else does either. A lot easier than, say, looking out the many sources that are available.

The WSPU exhibition at the Prince’s Skating Rink took place from 13 to 26 May 1909. Sylvia Pankhurst designed and executed the twenty feet high decorations for the hall, helped by three women with whom she had studied at the Royal College of Art, and four men who had also studied there. The exhibition included a mock up of a prison cell, a polling booth, an exhibition about the history of the suffrage movement, “Anti-Suffrage Waxworks”, plays, and ju jitsu lessons (useful in tussles with the police).

It also included a refreshment room where you could have tea and cake using china from Sylvia Pankhurst’s tea service. After the exhibition, the tea service was sold in sets. I don’t know how one of those sets made it all the way to Sydney, but I remember thinking it was a miracle it had survived the journey. And, of course, much as I coveted some of the tea set for myself, I didn’t think I’d ever own any of it.

But this year Suffrage Santa had other ideas! In the run up to Christmas, I eyed with some curiosity a large, mysterious parcel that appeared under the tree. Luckily, I refrained from shaking, rattling and tapping it in an effort to guess what was inside.

Which was:-


So now I am the joyful owner of a suffragette tea cup, saucer and plate! All I need is a packet of “Votes for Women” tea and maybe a few “Votes for Women” biscuits (both as sold in WSPU shops) to dunk in it…

You can find out more about suffragette china and tea rooms in a series of blogs by Elizabeth Crawford at https://womanandhersphere.com/tag/suffragette-tea/. 

'1909 Suffragette Exhibition Tea Set Expected to Fetch £1500 at Auction', Shropshire Star, 9 April 2019
 

Picture Credits:-

The WSPU Drum and Fife Band advertising the 1909 WSPU Exhibition, The Women's Library at LSE, No Known Copyright Restrictions




Comments

  1. Thank you. I loved reading about this particular aspect of the history of material culture within the women's movement. The tea set could be classed as a 'radical object' consumed in the context of a very recognisable ritual of English tradition.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment - I'm sorry I only just saw it. I'm glad you enjoyed teh blog and I love the idea of a radical tea set!

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'We will have a fire': arson during eighteenth-century enclosures

Join our Winter Solstice Blog Hop! Thirty writers throw light on a dazzling range of topics . Follow the links at the end of this article to be enlightened and brightened by our blogs...  “Inclosure came and trampled on the grave Of labours rights and left the poor a slave And memorys pride ere want to wealth did bow Is both the shadow and the substance now.”    John Clare, The Mores     On 1 May 1794, the writer Hester (Thrale) Piozzi of Streatham Park recorded in her diary that the furze on the common had been set on fire in protest at the enclosure of land “which really & of just Right belonged to the poor of the Parish”. Yet even while she acknowledged that the protesters had justice on their side, she criticised them for not “going to Law like wise fellows” and concluded: “So senseless are Le Peuple , & so unfitted to be souverain”. The senseless poor of Streatham were not unique. During the eighteenth centu...

My blog has moved to https://lucienneboyce.com/blog/

My blog has moved to my new website and is now at https://lucienneboyce.com/blog/  I'm no longer posting blogs on this site, but you can still read the old blogs on this site, or you can find them at the new location.     

From Hogarth to Rowlandson: Medicine in Art in Eighteenth Century Britain, Fiona Haslam, (Liverpool University Press, 1996)

I’m often asked about how I go about doing the research for my historical novels. One of the sources I usually mention is visual art. I’ve always found that looking at contemporary paintings, prints, sketches, sculpture and so on reveals a wealth of information about how people of the past lived – what they wore, what sort of houses they lived in, how they spent their time, the towns and villages they inhabited. Going to an art gallery is one of my favourite research trips – especially if there’s a decent café with tea and cake at the end of an afternoon’s study! Of course, you don’t always have to take artistic representations literally. It’s obvious that whatever you’re looking at is an interpretation of the reality: it’s how the artist saw it. In fact, this subjectivity can be a real advantage if you’re looking for ideas about how people lived and thought. Often the most exaggerated representations, such as satirical prints or caricature, are the most revealing, telling us thi...