Skip to main content

My Month in Books: January 2021

Here are two of the books I've enjoyed reading this month. They're both fantasies, but are very different from one another.

Kingdoms of Elfin, Sylvia Townsend Warner (HandheldPress)

This collection of short stories describes the Elfin kingdoms which exist side by side with our own world in the forests of Brittany, the Welsh mountains, the Netherlands and elsewhere. Warner’s fairy creatures are wonderful creations. They are untroubled by many of the things that humans obsess over: the fleetingness of life (they are long-lived though not immortal); morals (they have none); conscience (they don’t have any); the state of their souls (they don’t have souls and so have no concept of an after life). They are carelessly cruel, though they aren’t without feelings; mercurial and changeable though they cling to tradition; and though we see them through the prism of human concerns (love, vanity, ambition, hatred etc etc), they are simply, deliciously un-human.

The structure of the stories often reflects this. They don’t always follow the narrative arc you’d expect. Characters fade away, significant events are dealt with in a few lines, deaths recorded as an afterthought. The narrative is as unsentimental and careless as the fairies themselves.

The stories are a dazzling flight of the imagination, rooted in a scholarly outlook. They are bracing, original, refreshing and totally, brilliantly true in that way the best stories (myths, fantasies?) are. I really loved Kingdoms of Elfin. Handheld Books have produced a lovely edition with an introduction and notes.   

 

Two books I've enjoyed in January

 The Final Empire, Brandon Sanderson (Gollancz)

This is the first book in the Mistborn series and it’s unputdownable, gripping, page-turning – all of that and more. It’s got good v evil, a nasty dark lord just asking to be overthrown, morally ambiguous good guys ready to attempt the overthrowing (they’re thieves, forgers, conmen), wicked and not so wicked oppressing aristos, and a plucky street urchin par excellence in Vin, who in true fantasy style has Powers She Didn’t Know She Has That She Has To Learn to Wield.

I’ll admit that at times the prose seemed a bit odd and clunky to me (people don’t ‘jump off’, they ‘jump off of’ walls) but I think that may be because of the ‘two countries divided by a common language’ thing. And, yes, I know that explaining the magic and its limitations are very important but I didn’t really care all that much how Allomancy worked once I’d got the basic idea. And there were one or two teeny weeny little cheats disguised as plot twists, in particular one at the end which was a bit like someone carrying a device around and telling people it enabled them to communicate with friends at a distance, and suddenly announcing in a sticky spot that actually it’s also a transporter as well. (And no, that doesn’t happen.) And I was just a little disappointed when a strong female heroine fell into a man’s arms sighing that was all she’d ever really wanted. I’m hoping she’ll have moved on by Book 2.

But I kept on reading! And that is because the characters are great, the plot twists twisty, and the suspense very suspenseful. So I am going on to Book 2, The Well of Ascension.

Incidentally, I almost changed my mind about this when, just before finishing The Final Empire, I looked on Amazon to check what the next book in the series is – and the blurb for that book told me what happened in Book 1! Blurb writer, that was seriously disappointing.   

Nevertheless, I am looking forward to the next in the series – and I’m carefully avoiding the blurbs from now on.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dickens and Chickens

On 17 April 1860, in fields near Farnborough, Charles Dickens joined an audience amongst whom were the Prince of Wales and the Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston, as well as a number of MPs and clergymen, to watch the American John Carmel Heenan and England’s Tom Sayers (the Brighton Titch) beat one another blind and bloody in a bare-knuckle fight that lasted nearly two and a half hours. The fight ended in a draw when Aldershot police stormed the ring, forcing the fighters and their illustrious spectators to flee the scene. It was the brutality of this match that signalled an end to the bare-knuckle era and prompted the development of the Marquess of Queensberry’s rules. Dickens’s interest in pugilism was of long standing. In 1848 Dombey and Son , which had been published in serial form over the preceding two years, came out in book form. One of many of his novels that draws on the world of the prize fighter, it introduces the unforgettable Mr Toots, a would-be man about town, an

The Bristol Boys: The Bare Knuckle Champions and The Hatchet Inn

The Hatchet Inn on Frogmore Street in Bristol is all that remains of a row of seventeenth-century timbered houses dating back to 1606 – making it one of the city’s oldest pubs. It was substantially altered in the 1960s, and these days it stands on a traffic island. But at one time it boasted extensive grounds – and amongst the facilities on offer was a bare-knuckle boxing ring. Plaque at The Hatchet Inn, Bristol The pub’s connection with Bristol’s boxing heroes is commemorated in a plaque illustrating five of Bristol’s champions – one of whom, Hen Pearce, features in Bloodie Bones: A Dan Foster Mystery. Hen Pearce (Detail) Bristol born Hen Pearce, The Game Chicken (1777 – 1809), a former butcher’s boy, became champion of England in 1805. He was a hero inside and outside the ring. In 1807 he climbed onto the roof of a building in Thomas Street, Bristol to rescue a servant girl from a fire. Always a popular figure, this courageous act inspired many eulogies in pr

'We will have a fire': arson during eighteenth-century enclosures

Join our Winter Solstice Blog Hop! Thirty writers throw light on a dazzling range of topics . Follow the links at the end of this article to be enlightened and brightened by our blogs...  “Inclosure came and trampled on the grave Of labours rights and left the poor a slave And memorys pride ere want to wealth did bow Is both the shadow and the substance now.”    John Clare, The Mores     On 1 May 1794, the writer Hester (Thrale) Piozzi of Streatham Park recorded in her diary that the furze on the common had been set on fire in protest at the enclosure of land “which really & of just Right belonged to the poor of the Parish”. Yet even while she acknowledged that the protesters had justice on their side, she criticised them for not “going to Law like wise fellows” and concluded: “So senseless are Le Peuple , & so unfitted to be souverain”. The senseless poor of Streatham were not unique. During the eighteenth century, enclosure resisters throughout the