Skip to main content

Cribb's Parlour: Tom Cribb



I’m an inveterate English Heritage blue-plaque spotter – and if I’d missed this one in Panton Street, Haymarket, London, the pub sign would have been enough to tell me that I was standing outside the home of Bristol pugilistic champion Tom Cribb (1781-1848). 


Cribb was born in Hanham but moved to London when he was a boy. He went on to work as a bellhanger, then a coal porter – which job earned him the nickname The Black Diamond. He later joined the Navy. His first fight was a seventy-six round bout against George Maddox in 1805. His only defeat was against George Nicholls in the same year.

Cribb then trained under the famous sportsman and pedestrianist Captain Barclay, who prepared him for his 1807 fight against the reigning champion of England, Bristolian Jem Belcher. After his defeat, Belcher demanded a rematch, which took place in 1809 with the same result. (You can read more about Jem Belcher and other pugilists who are mentioned in Bloodie Bones: A Dan Foster Mystery on the Dan Foster’sWorld webpage).

Cribb fought the black American pugilist Tom Molineaux in 1810. During the forty-round fight, the former slave was treated to a barrage of racist abuse from the crowd. The spectators also demonstrated their partiality in a practical way when two hundred of them stormed the ring to drag Molineaux off Cribb, who he had trapped against the ropes. In the twenty-eighth round Cribb was knocked down but was given time to recover by the delaying tactics of his seconds who falsely accused Molineaux of hiding lead weights in his fists. Molineaux demanded a rematch, which took place in 1811; the American ended up the loser with a fractured jaw. On his return to London, Cribb was cheered through the streets. He was presented with a silver cup celebrating his victories, on which was engraved the Bristol coat of arms and a motto from Macbeth: “And damn’d be he who first cries, Hold! Enough!”

Cribb, like many pugilists, became a publican when he left the ring. He ran the Golden Lion in Southwark, then the King’s Arms on Duke Street, and finally the Union Arms on Panton Street – now called The Tom Cribb. The pub – known as Cribb’s Parlour – was a popular haunt with the Fancy (prize fighters and their fans), Lord Byron amongst them.

Cribb was the unchallenged champion of England between 1811 and 1821, after which he was allowed to retain the title of champion until he died. He was one of the prize fighters who guarded the entrance to Westminster Hall during George IV’s coronation. Thereafter things began to fall apart: after suffering heavy gambling losses he lost The Union Arms. His last years were spent living off the generosity of friends and admirers, and he died in his son’s house in 1848.

Visit the Tom Cribb page on Open Plaques website (Open Plaques is a community project which catalogues blue plaques) http://openplaques.org/plaques/6326

English Heritage – Plaques to Sporting Achievers  https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/imported-docs/a-e/blue-plaques-to-sporting-achievers.pdf

Picture: Michael Freeman 

Comments

  1. I found this blog when I was looking for information about Cribb's Parlour, a place that is mentioned in several of Georgette Heyer's books. Is there any proof that there was such a place for gentlemen of a sporting mien to enjoy the physical pursuits of boxing etc.?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hallo, thanks for your comment. There is indeed proof that such places existed.Cribb's Parlour is referred to eg in The Bristol Boys by Jack Allen (2009). Also The Times 18 Sept 1821 refers to it in connection with a stage production at Astley's. Pearce Egan refers to it in his 1820s Tom and Jerry stories. Many boxers owned pubs - eg John Gully; also Jem Belcher - Hen Pearce fought Joe Berks in a room at Belcher's London pub. Such sporting clubs/venues were very popular with The Fancy. Incidentally if you are looking for contemporary information on rackety life in London you will find Pearce Egan's Life in London (1823) invaluable - and a cracking read!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'We will have a fire': arson during eighteenth-century enclosures

Join our Winter Solstice Blog Hop! Thirty writers throw light on a dazzling range of topics . Follow the links at the end of this article to be enlightened and brightened by our blogs...  “Inclosure came and trampled on the grave Of labours rights and left the poor a slave And memorys pride ere want to wealth did bow Is both the shadow and the substance now.”    John Clare, The Mores     On 1 May 1794, the writer Hester (Thrale) Piozzi of Streatham Park recorded in her diary that the furze on the common had been set on fire in protest at the enclosure of land “which really & of just Right belonged to the poor of the Parish”. Yet even while she acknowledged that the protesters had justice on their side, she criticised them for not “going to Law like wise fellows” and concluded: “So senseless are Le Peuple , & so unfitted to be souverain”. The senseless poor of Streatham were not unique. During the eighteenth centu...

My blog has moved to https://lucienneboyce.com/blog/

My blog has moved to my new website and is now at https://lucienneboyce.com/blog/  I'm no longer posting blogs on this site, but you can still read the old blogs on this site, or you can find them at the new location.     

From Hogarth to Rowlandson: Medicine in Art in Eighteenth Century Britain, Fiona Haslam, (Liverpool University Press, 1996)

I’m often asked about how I go about doing the research for my historical novels. One of the sources I usually mention is visual art. I’ve always found that looking at contemporary paintings, prints, sketches, sculpture and so on reveals a wealth of information about how people of the past lived – what they wore, what sort of houses they lived in, how they spent their time, the towns and villages they inhabited. Going to an art gallery is one of my favourite research trips – especially if there’s a decent café with tea and cake at the end of an afternoon’s study! Of course, you don’t always have to take artistic representations literally. It’s obvious that whatever you’re looking at is an interpretation of the reality: it’s how the artist saw it. In fact, this subjectivity can be a real advantage if you’re looking for ideas about how people lived and thought. Often the most exaggerated representations, such as satirical prints or caricature, are the most revealing, telling us thi...