Welcome to the SilverWood Books Blog
Hop!
A
few of our authors have come together to share a variety of articles and items
of interest on their blogs for your enjoyment. There are some lovely giveaway
prizes, and – to stay in keeping with the Spring and rebirth theme at this time
of year – some colourful Easter eggs. Feel free to collect the eggs, and use
them where you like. They were drawn by SilverWood author Peter St John who
writes the ‘Gang’ series about a boy who was evacuated to a village near
Ipswich during WWII. Meet Peter and his characters on the Blog Hop, along with
a host of eggcellent SilverWood authors.
To find their blogs follow the links at the bottom of the page.
(Links will be live from 17 April 2014.)
Have fun!
Helen Hart
Publishing Director, SilverWood Books
www.silverwoodbooks.co.uk
And here is my blog...The Female Writer's Apology; Or, Then and Now
In
my eighteenth-century thriller, To The
Fair Land, Ben Dearlove’s adventures start when he tries to find the
anonymous author of a book about a voyage to the South Seas. His first clue to
the writer’s identity is the realisation that the book cannot be by a woman
because:
“No
woman ever launched a volume on the world without apologising for it first. ‘Took up my pen with no thought of
publication... Nothing but the necessity to provide for a young family could
have induced me to lay this trifle before the public... Beg the reader will
look kindly upon it for all its demerits.’ ” (Chapter 5).
Why
did this detail matter to me?
Partly,
of course, because it reflects a view that Ben would very likely have held:
women couldn’t write serious books. It also says something about the
eighteenth-century literary scene. It was common practice for writers to preface
their books with a modest disclaimer about its literary worth, which was
usually a sly way of proclaiming its merits: “it’s not very good, but...”
Sheridan’s
preface to The Rivals is a long apology
for the defects of an earlier draft of the play, which he says fully deserved
criticism. Few writers, he adds, “do not wish to palliate the faults which they
acknowledge” and “second their confession of its deficiencies, by whatever plea
seems least disgraceful to their ability” – his plea is inexperience. Even so,
Sheridan has enough confidence to refer to his “ability” and to defend his work
from “little puny critics” who are “spleen-swoln”.
William
Godwin, in an introduction to the 1831 edition of St Leon, originally published in 1799, refers to the “diffidence”
which kept him from attempting another novel after the publication of Caleb Williams in 1794. Evidently, he
got over it. In his preface to Tom Jones,
Henry Fielding asks the reader “that he will not expect to find perfection in
this work;...and...that he will excuse some parts of it, if they fall short of
that little merit which may appear in others”. At the same time, had he “been
sensible of any great demerit in the work” he would not have sought patronage
for it.
Even
when mocking the parade of false modesty, writers were rarely able to stray from
it. In his memoirs, bookseller James Lackington, ostensibly rejecting the custom
of pointing out his “weaknesses and imperfections”, self-deprecatingly would consider
himself “amply rewarded” if the reader deems his memoir “not the worst” ever
written. For all that, he claims there is merit in his work. It shows what can be
achieved by “a persevering habit of industry, and an upright conscientious demeanour
in trade”.
Samuel
Richardson’s own trumpet-blowing in Pamela
– “he thinks any apology for it unnecessary” – seems almost refreshing by comparison.
Almost.
There
was one thing the men never apologised for, and that was their gender. When a woman took up her pen she had to come
up with a good excuse for trespassing on male territory. There was nothing frivolous
about this, even if the excuses were often thin. A common one was the need to
earn a living. Elizabeth Inchbald in A
Simple Story says she was driven to write by “Necessity! – thou, who art
the instigator of so many bad authors and actors”. Charlotte Smith in her
preface to her radical novel Desmond referred
to the “affairs of my family” which forced her to write for money (her
estranged husband claimed her earnings, as he was legally entitled to do), and
she also confronts the criticism that “women...have no business with politics”.
The
ultimate apology a woman could make was anonymity. Of course, many men published
anonymously, for example to avoid prosecution, or to protect their professional
status – Henry Fielding published some works anonymously because he was a
magistrate. However, the male writer had only to hide his name, not his gender.
Sarah
Scott’s Millenium Hall was written by
“A Gentleman on his Travels”. Frances Burney published her first novel Evelina in secret, sparking off an
excited debate about whether the writer was a man or a woman. Revealing their gender
was a serious undertaking for women writers. When Clara Reeve published a
revised edition of The Old English Baron
it was only after a great deal of persuasion and “with extreme reluctance” that
she could “suffer my name to appear in the title page”.
Sarah
Fielding’s authorship of The Adventures
of David Simple was only made known when the rumour got about that her brother
Henry had written the book and he felt the need to defend himself from
accusations of hypocrisy (he had vowed never to publish anonymously). The
second edition revealed Sarah’s authorship, but it was Henry who wrote the
preface which focuses on – Henry.
However, the main reason the detail
mattered to me is that women writers are still concealing their gender. J K
Rowling published her Harry Potter books using initials on the advice of publishers
who said boys would not read the books if they knew a woman wrote them. She
went on to publish her detective novels under a man’s name (there’s a long
tradition for this – the Brontes, George Eliot...). The use of initials by women
authors is common in fantasy, science fiction and thrillers. Manda Scott changed
to M C Scott because, she says, most men do not buy books by women. It’s harder
for women to get their books reviewed too – in March 2013 a Guardian survey
found that 8.7% of books reviewed in
the London Review of Books were by women; 26.1% in the New Statesmen; and 34.1%
in the Guardian. The figures are no better in America, as the VIDA project’s
annual count shows.
Historical fiction is as much about the present as the past. It reflects
our own situation and preoccupations, and for me that’s what makes it relevant.
It’s a way of asking: how much has changed? As Ben Dearlove’s remarks suggest,
for women writers it sometimes seems not very much.
Why Women Writers Still Take Male Names, Wall Street Journal, 6 December 2012,
Year of Reading Women Declared for 2014, The Guardian, 22 January 2014
Gender Bias in Books Journalism Remains Acute, The Guardian, 2 March 2012
The Gender Balance of UK Literary Culture, The Guardian, 8 June 2013
Book Review Byline Tally Shows Gender Disparity, The New York Times, 23 February
2014
The VIDA Count – project set up in 2009 to investigate US literary magazines
Everyone who leaves a comment will be entered in a prize draw to win a signed copy of To The Fair Land. (Comment form at bottom of page.)
There are six in all scattered throughout the Blog Hop. Collect them all and feel free to use them on your own Blog or Facebook – or wherever you like!
And now hop along to more Easter blogs by following these links:-
Helen Hollick Let us Talk of Many Things Fictional Reality.
Alison Morton Roma Nova How the Romans Celebrated Spring
Anna Belfrage Step
inside... Is Freezing in a Garret a Prerequisite?
Edward Hancox Iceland
Defrosted Seaweed and cocoa
Matlock the Hare Matlock the Hare Blog Pid-padding the Self-Published Pathway...
Michael Wills Michael Wills A Doomed Army
Isabel Burt Friday Fruitfulness Flees for
the Easter Hop..
Debbie Young Young By NameThe Alchemy of Chocolate
Peter St John Jenno's Blog My
Village
Caz Greenham Caz's Devon Blog Diary Springtime and Hanging Baskets
Helen Hart SilverWood
Books Ltd
Thank you for sharing this post! I really like this line, "The ultimate apology a woman could make was anonymity." Cripes, isn't that the truth!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment! Yes, women's invisibility in so many spheres - not only literature - is very frustrating I think, particularly when women feel they have to go along with it...
DeleteGreat post, Lucienne. I'll be retweeting this one for a while to come.
ReplyDeleteHelen (not HM) Hart x
Thanks Helen! Glad you found it interesting.
DeleteLoved your post, Lucienne. Is a reminder to me of what went on in my grandmother's, and especially, my great grandmother's day! Thank you for sharing.
ReplyDeleteThanks Caz, glad you enjoyed it, and of course sad that's it still happening.
DeleteThought-provoking and somewhat depressing. "Plus ca change" and all that. Will tweet!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Anna. Yes it is a tad depressing, especially when we all know that women's writing is just as good as the men's!
DeleteAn excellent point, Lucienne. I thought long and hard about whether to publish as A M Morton or Alison Morton and in the end plumped for my normal name. The 'this is who I am and this is what I've written - take it or leave it' approach.
ReplyDeleteGender expectations are still very entrenched. I have a number of Romantic Novelists' Association colleagues who are men, but almost all, if not all, write under a female pseudonym, e.g. Bill Spence/Jessica Blair.
Hi Alison, yes I know many men write romance under female names, which is another sign of the way gender expectations work. I like your approach though!
DeleteThank you. I've used my initials since college and appreciated the anonymous cloak they provided in the business world. Surprised, and a bit disappointed, to find initials still work for women in today's writers world. K.J. McIntyre (@McIntyreKJ)
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. That's a really interesting perspective on the issue of female anonymity, ie that it functions in the business world too.
ReplyDeleteLeaving a quick comment Lucienne as I'm battling flu :-( this post looks so interesting, I'm calling back when I feel a bit better to devour it!
ReplyDeleteHope you get well soon!
DeleteVery interesting post about women disguising themselves as men in order to sell more books. I wonder if there any examples of books written by men under the guise of a woman!
ReplyDeleteHallo Denise, thank you, I'm glad you found the post interesting. Yes, there are men who write romance under female names - Jessica Blair is one. Which I think shows another way that gender expectations work...
ReplyDeleteFigures it would be while writing Romance books!
DeleteBut that is interesting too.
It certainly is! Raises all sorts of further questions...
DeleteHi Denise Congratulations you've won the draw so I'll be sending you a copy of To The Fair Land, if you could email me an address to lucienne[at]lucienneboyce.com
DeleteWell, I'm very glad that you publish under your full and very feminine name, Lucienne - the Suffragettes would be proud of you! Thanks for a very interesting and intelligent post. Well, I expect nothing less from you, even though you are a woman ;)
ReplyDeleteThanks Debbie! Actually one of the things I like about my Christian names is that both are capable of being either male or female. So I could call myself Lucien Boyce and be male yet still keep my own name! My middle name too is capable of being either male or female. But I shan't tell you what it is just so I can maintain an air of mystery...
DeleteHow sad that we stil have to pretend to be men in this day and age. But do women and men tend to write different things? Most (not all) of my favourite authors are women as it happens. But is this governed by the genres I prefer? Not romance, but contemporary women's fiction for the most part. The exceptions? McEwan is the first to spring to mind. Good to see more and more women authors - and characters - on the crime scene too. Lots to think about - stand by for a blog post! A.
ReplyDeleteThat's a very interesting question. I suppose that if women and men are writing, say, thrillers, or fantasy, they are writing the same kind of thing - at least to some extent? Perhaps women writers take a different angle...I look forward to your blog exploring this.
DeletePS from me - I've just started rereading Virginia Woolf's "A Room Of One's Own", inspired by your post, Lucienne - or Lucien, or whoever you wish to be today ;) Being a Debbie is rather more limiting...
ReplyDeleteI hope you enjoy reading Virginia Woolf. I'm still Lucienne today...
ReplyDelete