Skip to main content

A mote will turn the balance

When I was at school I had problems with A Midsummer Night’s Dream. It wasn’t just the dull way it was taught in my school back in the day. Students nowadays have much livelier texts to read from; many don’t even have to read a whole Shakespeare play any more but can get by with extracts. (Though how deciding half the school population are too stupid to read Shakespeare and thus denying them access to a hugely important element of our culture fits into the brave new widening participation world is beyond me. Still, it keeps the school exam results looking good.)

The real issue for me was the play’s violence. This is a work that is often played as if it’s sweet and light, a bit of a romp, an easy confection. It’s got fairies, hasn’t it? But for me from the very start it was the violence that struck and disturbed me. A play that opens with a father threatening his daughter with death if she doesn’t marry the man of his choice, and that daughter being told that her father should be as a god to her, filled me with horror. The funny thing was that no one else in the classroom, least of all the teacher, seemed to notice. Nor did the sexuality of the play bother them, the hints of bestiality (“lion, bear, or wolf, or bull…she shall pursue it with the soul of love”), of rape (Hippolyta “wooed with my sword”, Demetrius’s veiled threat to Helena who risks “the rich worth of her virginity” by putting herself into his power), and of domestic violence. “The more you beat me I will fawn on you” declares Helena, as forgiving as any battered wife. And I always, always, felt sorry for poor Bottom, who was made such a dreadful fool of though he didn’t seem such a bad sort to me. I always thought it was Theseus who deserved a lot more than he got.

So for many years I didn’t go near the play. I didn’t read it, and I didn’t go to see it performed. I managed to enjoy Mendelssohn but that was as far as I got. Then Gerard persuaded me to go to a production by Shakespeare at the Tobacco Factory (SATTF) (on 1 March). I’d seen their fabulous Much Ado About Nothing and thought I’d give A Midsummer Night’s Dream a chance. The Tobacco Factory is a theatre carved out of a section of the abandoned Imperial Tobacco factory that once dominated Bristol, and SATTF is an unsubsidised theatre company who produce Shakespeare, and you will know all you need to know about them if you read their artistic policy at http://www.sattf.org.uk/index.php?id=9. (Which is a far cry from the brave new widening participation world of teaching Shakespeare in bits.)

That did it for me. SATTF showed me, first of all, what a brilliantly constructed play it is. Then they drew my attention to the wonder of the language, to its bucolic madness, its primrose beds, oxlips, and eglantine, and the love-wounded flower which is the instrument of the human madness. They showed me the mundane world where magic dwells: anarchic, challenging magic that makes the butter fail and old dames fall onto their bums. They evoked the figure of Silvanus, god of the wild woods that encroach with exuberant power on our feeble constructions of reality, and inflict us with such blessed, blessed madness. And then, when they’d pulled out all sorts of spiritual rugs, made men into beasts, scarified young women with lovers’ scorn and tangled briars, destroyed childhood friendships, and made parents the objects of terror for their children, everything was restored. The protagonists were left loving and sleeping safely in their palace, though the screeching owls and howling wolves were still outside.

For that is one aspect of the play’s power and magic. The darkness is always there, the violence that I so feared as a young girl, the suffering, the anarchic forces of Faerie. But in the end, after all the pain and confusion, it is a fundamentally good world. The fairies come to challenge; they also come to bless.

A wonderful production, filled with wonderful things amongst which I recall Jay Villiers’s Theseus and Oberon, Christopher Staines’s Puck, Rebecca Pownall’s towering Helena, Jonathan Nibb’s gloriously absurd Bottom, and above all Felix Hayes’s Wall. If you get the chance, go and see SATTF do anything. As for me, I’m half way through reading A Midsummer Night’s Dream and haven’t time to linger in this dream world.


For Shakespeare at the Tobacco Factory see http://www.sattf.org.uk
For the Tobacco Factory see http://www.tobaccofactory.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dickens and Chickens

On 17 April 1860, in fields near Farnborough, Charles Dickens joined an audience amongst whom were the Prince of Wales and the Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston, as well as a number of MPs and clergymen, to watch the American John Carmel Heenan and England’s Tom Sayers (the Brighton Titch) beat one another blind and bloody in a bare-knuckle fight that lasted nearly two and a half hours. The fight ended in a draw when Aldershot police stormed the ring, forcing the fighters and their illustrious spectators to flee the scene. It was the brutality of this match that signalled an end to the bare-knuckle era and prompted the development of the Marquess of Queensberry’s rules. Dickens’s interest in pugilism was of long standing. In 1848 Dombey and Son , which had been published in serial form over the preceding two years, came out in book form. One of many of his novels that draws on the world of the prize fighter, it introduces the unforgettable Mr Toots, a would-be man about town, an...

The Bristol Boys: The Bare Knuckle Champions and The Hatchet Inn

The Hatchet Inn on Frogmore Street in Bristol is all that remains of a row of seventeenth-century timbered houses dating back to 1606 – making it one of the city’s oldest pubs. It was substantially altered in the 1960s, and these days it stands on a traffic island. But at one time it boasted extensive grounds – and amongst the facilities on offer was a bare-knuckle boxing ring. Plaque at The Hatchet Inn, Bristol The pub’s connection with Bristol’s boxing heroes is commemorated in a plaque illustrating five of Bristol’s champions – one of whom, Hen Pearce, features in Bloodie Bones: A Dan Foster Mystery. Hen Pearce (Detail) Bristol born Hen Pearce, The Game Chicken (1777 – 1809), a former butcher’s boy, became champion of England in 1805. He was a hero inside and outside the ring. In 1807 he climbed onto the roof of a building in Thomas Street, Bristol to rescue a servant girl from a fire. Always a popular figure, this courageous act inspired many eulogies in pr...

'We will have a fire': arson during eighteenth-century enclosures

Join our Winter Solstice Blog Hop! Thirty writers throw light on a dazzling range of topics . Follow the links at the end of this article to be enlightened and brightened by our blogs...  “Inclosure came and trampled on the grave Of labours rights and left the poor a slave And memorys pride ere want to wealth did bow Is both the shadow and the substance now.”    John Clare, The Mores     On 1 May 1794, the writer Hester (Thrale) Piozzi of Streatham Park recorded in her diary that the furze on the common had been set on fire in protest at the enclosure of land “which really & of just Right belonged to the poor of the Parish”. Yet even while she acknowledged that the protesters had justice on their side, she criticised them for not “going to Law like wise fellows” and concluded: “So senseless are Le Peuple , & so unfitted to be souverain”. The senseless poor of Streatham were not unique. During the eighteenth centu...